Reporting data analysis methods in high-impact respiratory journals
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reporting of results in ClinicalTrials.gov and high-impact journals.
Reporting of Results in ClinicalTrials.gov andHigh-Impact Journals The 2007 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Amendments Act expanded requirements for ClinicalTrials.gov, a public clinical trial registry maintained by the National Library of Medicine, mandating results reporting within 12 months of trial completion for all FDA-regulated medical products. Reporting of mandatory trial registrati...
متن کاملMethods for regression analysis in high-dimensional data
By evolving science, knowledge and technology, new and precise methods for measuring, collecting and recording information have been innovated, which have resulted in the appearance and development of high-dimensional data. The high-dimensional data set, i.e., a data set in which the number of explanatory variables is much larger than the number of observations, cannot be easily analyzed by ...
متن کاملPublic Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest to make primary data from published research publicly available. We aimed to assess the current status of making research data available in highly-cited journals across the scientific literature. METHODS AND RESULTS We reviewed the first 10 original research papers of 2009 published in the 50 original research journals with the highest impact factor. Fo...
متن کاملNo improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals
BACKGROUND When subgroup analyses are not correctly analyzed and reported, incorrect conclusions may be drawn, and inappropriate treatments provided. Despite the increased recognition of the importance of subgroup analysis, little information exists regarding the prevalence, appropriateness, and study characteristics that influence subgroup analysis. The objective of this study is to determine ...
متن کاملSystematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals
BACKGROUND Selective outcome reporting is a significant methodological concern. Comparisons between the outcomes reported in clinical trial registrations and those later published allow investigators to understand the extent of selection bias among trialists. We examined the possibility of selective outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in neurology journals. METH...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ERJ Open Research
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2312-0541
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00140-2017